vs
4.0Noise control & calls9.2
Why is KPH40 Utility better than TAH6509?
- Lowest frequency15 Hz vs 20 Hz+33%
Why is TAH6509 better than KPH40 Utility?
- Active noise cancellingNo · KPH40 Utility: Yes
- Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Lowest frequency | 15 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 25,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 60 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 101 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 70 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 45 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
