How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TUK vs Borea BR03 Connect

Kanto TUK vs Triangle Borea BR03 Connect

What TUK does better (2) and where Borea BR03 Connect wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Kanto TUK
Kanto · 2022TUK
2 advantages≈ $860
vs
Triangle Borea BR03 Connect
Triangle · 2023Borea BR03 Connect
1 advantage≈ $700
Dimensions

Size comparison

TUKBorea BR03 Connect
178 × 276215206 × 360314
TUKBorea BR03 ConnectDifference
Height276 mm360 mm−84 mm
Width178 mm206 mm−28 mm
Depth215 mm314 mm−99 mm
Weight5,000 g16,700 g−11,700 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TUK better than Borea BR03 Connect?

  1. Weight5,000 g vs 16,700 g3.3×
  2. Output power130 W vs 120 W+8%

Why is Borea BR03 Connect better than TUK?

  1. Bluetooth version4.2 vs 5+19%
Specifications

Side by side

Kanto TUKKanto TUK≈ $860
Sound
Output power130 W120 W
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency50 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version4.25
Bluetooth codecsaptX HD, AAC, SBCaptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXYesYes
LDACNoNo
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Optical inputYesYes
Design & build
Weight5,000 g16,700 g
Width178 mm206 mm
Height276 mm360 mm
Depth215 mm314 mm
Features
Remote controlYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare