How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TUK vs Woburn III

Kanto TUK vs Marshall Woburn III

What TUK does better (4) and where Woburn III wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kanto TUK
Kanto · 2022TUK
4 advantages≈ $860
vs
Marshall Woburn III
Marshall · 2022Woburn III
4.7Score
2 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
9.1Sound8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

TUKWoburn III
178 × 276215400 × 317203
TUKWoburn IIIDifference
Height276 mm317 mm−41 mm
Width178 mm400 mm−222 mm
Depth215 mm203 mm+12 mm
Weight5,000 g7,450 g−2,450 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TUK better than Woburn III?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Woburn III: No
  2. Weight5,000 g vs 7,450 g+49%
  3. Output power130 W vs 120 W+8%
  4. aptXYes · Woburn III: No

Why is Woburn III better than TUK?

  1. Bluetooth version4.2 vs 5.2+24%
  2. Lowest frequency50 Hz vs 35 Hz+43%
Specifications

Side by side

Kanto TUKKanto TUK≈ $860
Sound
Output power130 W120 W
Speaker channels2.0Stereo
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency50 Hz35 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version4.25.2
Bluetooth codecsaptX HD, AAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
LE Audio—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
HDMI eARC / ARC—Yes
Optical inputYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight5,000 g7,450 g
Width178 mm400 mm
Height276 mm317 mm
Depth215 mm203 mm
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx0
Features
Remote controlYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare