How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ORA Reference Desktop Speakers vs Muo

Kanto ORA Reference Desktop Speakers vs KEF Muo

What ORA Reference Desktop Speakers does better (2) and where Muo wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kanto ORA Reference Desktop Speakers
2 advantages≈ $270
vs
KEF Muo
KEF · 2025Muo
2 advantages≈ $210
Dimensions

Size comparison

ORA Reference Desktop SpeakersMuo
100 × 17514182 × 21659
ORA Reference Desktop SpeakersMuoDifference
Height175 mm216 mm−41 mm
Width100 mm82 mm+18 mm
Depth141 mm59 mm+82 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ORA Reference Desktop Speakers better than Muo?

  1. Output power50 W vs 40 W+25%
  2. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+10%

Why is Muo better than ORA Reference Desktop Speakers?

  1. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.4+8%
  2. Lowest frequency70 Hz vs 43 Hz+63%
Specifications

Side by side

KEF MuoKEF Muo≈ $210
Sound
Output power50 W40 W
Lowest frequency70 Hz43 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life—24 h
Mains poweredYes—
Battery powered (portable)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.4
USB audioYesYes
Design & build
Width100 mm82 mm
Height175 mm216 mm
Depth141 mm59 mm
Protection rating—IP67
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx7
Dust protection (IP)—6
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare