vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
6.7Battery6.0
Why is XX HA-XC72T better than FALCON ANC?
- Battery life9 h vs 8.5 h+6%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is FALCON ANC better than XX HA-XC72T?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · XX HA-XC72T: Yes
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 42,000 Hz2.1×
- aptXNo · XX HA-XC72T: Yes
- Driver size6 mm vs 10 mm+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 42,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 8.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 7.5 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.6 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
