vs
4.3Battery5.6
8.8Build & features5.9
Why is XX HA-XC62T better than QCY-T1CPro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is QCY-T1CPro better than XX HA-XC62T?
- Battery life7 h vs 7.5 h+7%
- Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
- Earbud weight (each)4.4 g vs 4.2 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 7.5 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.4 g | 4.2 g |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
