vs
7.3Noise control & calls9.3
7.5Battery6.1
Why is WOOD master HA-FW5000T better than Buds 4 Pro?
- Battery life10.5 h vs 9 h+17%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Charging time2 h vs 4 h2×
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%
Why is Buds 4 Pro better than WOOD master HA-FW5000T?
Buds 4 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10.5 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 7 h | — |
| Total with charging case | — | 36 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 4 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6.5 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP55 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Shokz OpenFit ProvsJVC WOOD master HA-FW5000T8.38.6vs
JVC WOOD master HA-FW5000Tvsfinal TONALITE8.68.3
vsXiaomi Buds 5 ProvsJVC WOOD master HA-FW5000T8.68.6
vsXiaomi Buds 5 Pro Wi-Fi translucentvsJVC WOOD master HA-FW5000T8.68.6vs
JVC WOOD master HA-FW5000TvsEdifier Comfo Flexvs
JVC WOOD master HA-FW5000TvsEdifier A6