vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
7.5Battery6.7
7.4Build & features8.6
Why is WOOD master HA-FW5000T better than XX HA-XC72T?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · XX HA-XC72T: No
- Battery life10.5 h vs 9 h+17%
- LDACYes · XX HA-XC72T: No
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.2+15%
- Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
Why is XX HA-XC72T better than WOOD master HA-FW5000T?
- Battery life with ANC7 h vs 7.5 h+7%
- Earbud weight (each)6.5 g vs 4.6 g+41%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10.5 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 7 h | 7.5 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6.5 g | 4.6 g |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Shokz OpenFit ProvsJVC WOOD master HA-FW5000T8.28.6vs
JVC WOOD master HA-FW5000Tvsfinal TONALITE8.68.3
vsXiaomi Buds 5 ProvsJVC WOOD master HA-FW5000T8.58.6
vsXiaomi Buds 5 Pro Wi-Fi translucentvsJVC WOOD master HA-FW5000T8.68.6vs
JVC WOOD master HA-FW5000TvsEdifier A6vs
JVC WOOD master HA-FW5000TvsEdifier Comfo Flex