vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
6.1Battery8.8
2.8Build & features2.9
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than WF-1000XM4?
- aptXYes · WF-1000XM4: No
- Driver size11 mm vs 6 mm+83%
Why is WF-1000XM4 better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Battery life9 h vs 12 h+33%
- LDACNo · WOOD HA-FW1000T: Yes
- Charging time2.5 h vs 1.5 h+67%
- Earbud weight (each)7.8 g vs 7.3 g+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 11 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 48,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 12 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.8 g | 7.3 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T5.06.0
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds 2 SM-R117vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T6.66.0
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T5.96.0vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsJBL Live Pro+ TWS6.06.0
vs
Sony WF-1000XM5vsSony WF-1000XM47.27.6