vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
6.1Battery9.2
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than FoKus H-ANC?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · FoKus H-ANC: No
- aptXYes · FoKus H-ANC: No
- Driver size11 mm vs 10 mm+10%
Why is FoKus H-ANC better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Battery life9 h vs 13 h+44%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Hybrid |
| Driver size | 11 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 48,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 13 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.8 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
