vs
7.2Noise control & calls3.0
6.1Battery2.7
2.8Build & features6.3
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than Minor III?
- Active noise cancellingYes · Minor III: No
- Battery life9 h vs 5 h+80%
- Highest frequency48,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2.4×
Why is Minor III better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Earbud weight (each)7.8 g vs 4 g+95%
- Driver size11 mm vs 12 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 11 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 48,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 5 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 25 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | — |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.8 g | 4 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T5.06.0
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds 2 SM-R117vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T6.66.0
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T5.96.0vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsJBL Live Pro+ TWS6.06.0
vs
Marshall Minor IIIvsApple AirPods (3rd Gen)4.14.5