vs
7.0Battery3.5
7.1Build & features8.5
Why is nearphones HA-NP80T better than Push 720 Open?
- Battery life9.5 h vs 6 h+58%
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%
Why is Push 720 Open better than nearphones HA-NP80T?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx7+40%
- Dust protection (IP)5 vs 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 122 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9.5 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 24 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LC3 |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 90 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | 9.2 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 6 |
| Colours | — | Black/Silver, Bone/Gold, Glimmer, Cement, Crazy Pink, Chrome, Future |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Soundcore AeroFit 2 ProvsJVC nearphones HA-NP80T8.18.2
vs
JVC nearphones HA-NP80TvsShokz OpenFit Air 28.27.6
vs
Realme Buds Air 8 ProvsJVC nearphones HA-NP80T8.28.2
vs
JVC nearphones HA-NP80TvsUgreen ClipBuds Pro 2
vs
Soundcore AeroFit 2 AIvsSkullcandy Push 720 Open5.75.4
vs
Skullcandy Push 720 OpenvsSamsung Galaxy Buds45.45.4
