vs
7.0Battery7.4
7.2Build & features3.2
Why is nearphones HA-NP80T better than Accentum Clip?
- Battery life9.5 h vs 9 h+6%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is Accentum Clip better than nearphones HA-NP80T?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · nearphones HA-NP80T: Yes
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
- LDACNo · nearphones HA-NP80T: Yes
- Earbud weight (each)9.2 g vs 6.8 g+35%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 128 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9.5 h | 9 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 36 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 9.2 g | 6.8 g |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Soundcore AeroFit 2 ProvsJVC nearphones HA-NP80T8.28.2vs
JVC nearphones HA-NP80TvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
JVC nearphones HA-NP80TvsSoundcore R50i NCvs
JVC nearphones HA-NP80TvsDeWalt Heavy Duty True Wireless In-Ear Kopfhörer Bluetooth 37h IP56
vs
Sennheiser Accentum ClipvsSamsung Galaxy Buds45.85.4vs
Sennheiser Accentum ClipvsJVC nearphones HA-NP1T25.86.2