vs
7.0Battery9.6
Why is nearphones HA-NP80T better than ENCO CLIP 2?
nearphones HA-NP80T has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is ENCO CLIP 2 better than nearphones HA-NP80T?
- Battery life9.5 h vs 40 h4.2×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 115 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9.5 h | 40 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 58 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 9.2 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Soundcore AeroFit 2 ProvsJVC nearphones HA-NP80T8.18.2
vs
JVC nearphones HA-NP80TvsShokz OpenFit Air 28.27.6
vs
Realme Buds Air 8 ProvsJVC nearphones HA-NP80T8.28.2
vs
JVC nearphones HA-NP80TvsUgreen ClipBuds Pro 2
vs
Teufel AIRY SPORTS TWS 2vsOPPO ENCO CLIP 26.97.1
vs
Fairphone Fairbuds 2vsOPPO ENCO CLIP 27.07.1
