vs
4.2Noise control & calls3.0
7.0Battery5.6
2.6Build & features4.3
Why is nearphones HA-NP50T better than WF-C500?
- Total with charging case38 h vs 20 h+90%
- Driver size16 mm vs 5.8 mm2.8×
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
Why is WF-C500 better than nearphones HA-NP50T?
- Battery life9.5 h vs 10 h+5%
- Earbud weight (each)8 g vs 5.4 g+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 16 mm | 5.8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9.5 h | 10 h |
| Total with charging case | 38 h | 20 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | 5.4 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
