vs
4.2Noise control & calls9.3
Why is nearphones HA-NP50T better than Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400?
nearphones HA-NP50T has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400 better than nearphones HA-NP50T?
- Active noise cancellingNo · nearphones HA-NP50T: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 16 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9.5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 38 h | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 60 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Bixby |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
JVC nearphones HA-NP50TvsBaseus Eli Sport 14.84.8
vsBelkin SoundForm nano2vsJVC nearphones HA-NP50T
vsSkullcandy Rail ANCvsJVC nearphones HA-NP50T
vsJVC Nearphones HA-NP35TvsJVC nearphones HA-NP50T3.84.8
vs
Soundcore Liberty 4 NCvsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400
vsHuawei FreeClipvsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400