vs
7.0Battery7.0
2.6Build & features7.1
Why is nearphones HA-NP50T better than nearphones HA-NP80T?
- Earbud weight (each)8 g vs 9.2 g+15%
Why is nearphones HA-NP80T better than nearphones HA-NP50T?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 16 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9.5 h | 9.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 38 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | 9.2 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JVC nearphones HA-NP50TvsBaseus Eli Sport 14.84.8
vsBelkin SoundForm nano2vsJVC nearphones HA-NP50T
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400vsJVC nearphones HA-NP50T
vsSkullcandy Rail ANCvsJVC nearphones HA-NP50T
vsJVC Nearphones HA-NP35TvsJVC nearphones HA-NP50T3.84.8
vs
Soundcore AeroFit 2 ProvsJVC nearphones HA-NP80T8.18.2