How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Nearphones HA-NP35T vs KH-CRZ40T

JVC Nearphones HA-NP35T vs Kenwood KH-CRZ40T

What Nearphones HA-NP35T does better (1) and where KH-CRZ40T wins (4) — every spec side by side.

JVC Nearphones HA-NP35T
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ $45
vs
Kenwood KH-CRZ40T
Kenwood · 2022KH-CRZ40T
7.8Score
4 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
2.9Battery4.7
2.1Build & features9.0

Why is Nearphones HA-NP35T better than KH-CRZ40T?

  1. Driver size16 mm vs 6 mm2.7×

Why is KH-CRZ40T better than Nearphones HA-NP35T?

  1. Battery life7 h vs 7.5 h+7%
  2. Earbud weight (each)12 g vs 4.1 g2.9×
  3. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  4. Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Fit—In-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver size16 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNo—
Battery & charging
Battery life7 h7.5 h
Total with charging case17 h—
Charging time2.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.1
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)12 g4.1 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare