vs
6.5Battery6.2
5.4Build & features7.5
Why is nearphones HA-NP1T2 better than OpenFit Air 2?
- Battery life9 h vs 8 h+12%
- Earbud weight (each)4.6 g vs 7.2 g+57%
Why is OpenFit Air 2 better than nearphones HA-NP1T2?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Driver size10 mm vs 11.8 mm+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 11.8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 98 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 8 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 36 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 3 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.6 g | 7.2 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Colours | — | Black, Ice Blue, White |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods 5vsJVC nearphones HA-NP1T26.46.2
vsSennheiser Accentum ClipvsJVC nearphones HA-NP1T25.86.2
vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-OhrhörervsJVC nearphones HA-NP1T2
vsSoundcore R50i NCvsJVC nearphones HA-NP1T2
vsShokz OpenFit Air 2vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-OhrhörervsShokz OpenFit Air 2vsSoundcore R50i NC