Why is HA-S59W better than WH-CH535?
HA-S59W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is WH-CH535 better than HA-S59W?
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 55 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 150 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 3 min → 1,5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 150 g |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
