How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HA-S36W vs TAK4206

JVC HA-S36W vs Philips TAK4206

What HA-S36W does better (2) and where TAK4206 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JVC HA-S36W
JVC · 2023HA-S36W
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ $20
Higher score
vs
Philips TAK4206
Philips · 2021TAK4206
4.1Score
2 advantages≈ $25
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
4.5Battery4.2

Why is HA-S36W better than TAK4206?

  1. Battery life35 h vs 28 h+25%
  2. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%

Why is TAK4206 better than HA-S36W?

  1. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
  2. Driver size30 mm vs 32 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

JVC HA-S36WJVC HA-S36W≈ $204.2
Philips TAK4206Philips TAK4206≈ $254.1
Sound
FitOn-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size30 mm32 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity—83 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h28 h
Charging time3 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight157 g—
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare