How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HA-NP40T vs TAA5608BK/00

JVC HA-NP40T vs Philips TAA5608BK/00

What HA-NP40T does better (4) and where TAA5608BK/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JVC HA-NP40T
JVC · 2024HA-NP40T
4 advantages≈ $45
vs
Philips TAA5608BK/00
Philips · 2023TAA5608BK/00
1 advantage≈ $30
2.7Battery2.4

Why is HA-NP40T better than TAA5608BK/00?

  1. Battery life7 h vs 6 h+17%
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 130 Hz6.5×
  3. Charging time2 h vs 6 h3×
  4. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 16,000 Hz+25%

Why is TAA5608BK/00 better than HA-NP40T?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitBone conductionBone conduction
Ear cup designOpen-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size16 mm—
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz130 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz16,000 Hz
Impedance—8 Ω
Sensitivity—88 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life7 h6 h
Charging time2 h6 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Protection ratingIPX4IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Colours—Black
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare