How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HA-FX550T vs OpenWear Stereo

JVC HA-FX550T vs Xiaomi OpenWear Stereo

What HA-FX550T does better (3) and where OpenWear Stereo wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JVC HA-FX550T
JVC · 2024HA-FX550T
5.6Score
3 advantages≈ $90
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi OpenWear Stereo
Xiaomi · 2024OpenWear Stereo
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ $85
7.2Noise control & calls3.0
2.6Battery5.2
4.3Build & features2.4

Why is HA-FX550T better than OpenWear Stereo?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · OpenWear Stereo: No
  2. LDACYes · OpenWear Stereo: No
  3. Earbud weight (each)5.4 g vs 9.6 g+78%

Why is OpenWear Stereo better than HA-FX550T?

  1. Battery life6 h vs 7 h+17%
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
Specifications

Side by side

JVC HA-FX550TJVC HA-FX550T≈ $905.6
Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size11 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h7 h
Battery life with ANC4 h—
Total with charging case—38 h
Charging time2 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCLHDC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)5.4 g9.6 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare