Why is HA-FX28W better than Ink'd?
HA-FX28W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Ink'd better than HA-FX28W?
- Weight13 g vs 1 g11.6×
- Driver size8.6 mm vs 10 mm+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 8.6 mm | 10 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6.5 h | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 13 g | 1 g |
| Protection rating | IPX2 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
