vs
Why is HA-FX28W better than 3,5 mm EO-IA500?
- Weight13 g vs 15 g+14%
- Charging time3 h vs 3.5 h+17%
Why is 3,5 mm EO-IA500 better than HA-FX28W?
3,5 mm EO-IA500 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 8.6 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 93 dB |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6.5 h | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 13 g | 15 g |
| Protection rating | IPX2 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
