Why is HA-EC75T better than P42i?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx5+40%
- Battery life with ANC9 h vs 8.5 h+6%
Why is P42i better than HA-EC75T?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · HA-EC75T: Yes
- Battery life11 h vs 12 h+9%
- Total with charging case40 h vs 56 h+40%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
- LDACNo · HA-EC75T: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6.1+13%
- Driver size6 mm vs 11 mm+83%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 14 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 6 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | 12 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 9 h | 8.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | 56 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 3.5 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.4 g |
| Protection rating | IP57 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Colours | — | Black, Oat White, Navy Blue, Purple |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
