vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
8.3Battery6.7
Why is HA-EC75T better than XX HA-XC72T?
- Battery life11 h vs 9 h+22%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx5+40%
- Battery life with ANC9 h vs 7.5 h+20%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is XX HA-XC72T better than HA-EC75T?
XX HA-XC72T has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 9 h | 7.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.6 g |
| Protection rating | IP57 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
