vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
5.6Battery3.2
6.0Build & features8.2
Why is HA-A30T better than Buds 3T Pro?
- Battery life9 h vs 6 h+50%
- Earbud weight (each)4.2 g vs 4.9 g+17%
Why is Buds 3T Pro better than HA-A30T?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · HA-A30T: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Total with charging case21 h vs 24 h+14%
- Driver size6 mm vs 10 mm+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Semi-open | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 6 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 7 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 21 h | 24 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | LHDC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.2 g | 4.9 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
