Why is HA-A30T better than WF-C500?
- Active noise cancellingYes · WF-C500: No
- Total with charging case21 h vs 20 h+5%
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
- Earbud weight (each)4.2 g vs 5.4 g+29%
- Driver size6 mm vs 5.8 mm+3%
Why is WF-C500 better than HA-A30T?
- Battery life9 h vs 10 h+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Semi-open | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 5.8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 7 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 21 h | 20 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.2 g | 5.4 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
