Why is HA-A23T better than TWS?
- Battery life9 h vs 7 h+29%
Why is TWS better than HA-A23T?
- Total with charging case26 h vs 36 h+38%
- Driver size6 mm vs 12.2 mm2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 12.2 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Microphones | — | 3 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 7 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 26 h | 36 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
