Why is HA-A20T better than Moto Buds?
HA-A20T has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Moto Buds better than HA-A20T?
- Battery life7 h vs 9 h+29%
- Driver size6 mm vs 12.4 mm2.1×
- Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 6 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 9 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 42 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1.5 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 3 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.2 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
