How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HA-A110T vs TAMS3

JVC HA-A110T vs Philips TAMS3

What HA-A110T does better (4) and where TAMS3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JVC HA-A110T
JVC · 2026HA-A110T
8.1Score
4 advantages≈ $90
Higher score
vs
Philips TAMS3
Philips · 2026TAMS3
7.5Score
1 advantage≈ $75
4.6Sound3.5
7.2Noise control & calls8.4
9.2Battery7.8
3.9Build & features6.8

Why is HA-A110T better than TAMS3?

  1. Battery life17 h vs 10 h+70%
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TAMS3: No
  3. Battery life with ANC13 h vs 7 h+86%
  4. LDACYes · TAMS3: No

Why is TAMS3 better than HA-A110T?

  1. Earbud weight (each)5.7 g vs 2.5 g2.3×
Specifications

Side by side

JVC HA-A110TJVC HA-A110T≈ $908.1
Philips TAMS3Philips TAMS3≈ $757.5
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—106 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—6
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life17 h10 h
Battery life with ANC13 h7 h
Total with charging case—42 h
Battery capacity—60 mAh
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 3 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version66
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)5.7 g2.5 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare