How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. JBUDS Sport ANC 4 vs Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK

JLab JBUDS Sport ANC 4 vs Philips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK

What JBUDS Sport ANC 4 does better (1) and where Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JLab JBUDS Sport ANC 4
JLab · 2025JBUDS Sport ANC 4
7.6Score
1 advantage≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Philips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
1 advantage≈ $60
5.4Noise control & calls9.3

Why is JBUDS Sport ANC 4 better than Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx5+20%

Why is Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK better than JBUDS Sport ANC 4?

  1. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity105 dB—
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Noise reduction (claimed)38 dB—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life14 h—
Battery life with ANC10 h—
Total with charging case60 h—
Charging time1.5 h—
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.4
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
Latency200 ms—
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Protection ratingIP66IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx6IPx5
Dust protection (IP)6—
ColoursGraphite, Pink, Cobalt, TealBlack
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare