vs
4.0Noise control & calls9.3
Why is JBuds Open Sport better than Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK?
JBuds Open Sport has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK better than JBuds Open Sport?
- Active noise cancellingNo · JBuds Open Sport: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 14.2 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 26 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 70 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Latency | 200 ms | — |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 13.9 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL Soundgear ClipsvsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
vsJBL Wave Flex 2vsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
vsSennheiser Accentum OpenvsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
vsJVC HA-EC77TvsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
vsAVIOT TE-Q3RvsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
vsJBL Tune 255NCvsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK