How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. GO Sport ANC vs TAT3000

JLab GO Sport ANC vs Philips TAT3000

What GO Sport ANC does better (1) and where TAT3000 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JLab GO Sport ANC
JLab · 2026GO Sport ANC
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Philips TAT3000
Philips · 2026TAT3000
0 advantages≈ $40
5.0Noise control & calls9.3

Why is GO Sport ANC better than TAT3000?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%

Why is TAT3000 better than GO Sport ANC?

TAT3000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity—106 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones2—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h—
Battery life with ANC8.5 h—
Total with charging case35 h—
Charging time—3 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—6
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Protection ratingIP55IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare