How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. GO POP vs TAT2139

JLab GO POP vs Philips TAT2139

What GO POP does better (1) and where TAT2139 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JLab GO POP
JLab · 2024GO POP
1 advantage≈ $25
vs
Philips TAT2139
Philips · 2024TAT2139
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
6.2Battery4.2

Why is GO POP better than TAT2139?

  1. Battery life9 h vs 7 h+29%

Why is TAT2139 better than GO POP?

  1. Driver size6 mm vs 13 mm2.2×
  2. Charging time2.2 h vs 2 h+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT2139Philips TAT2139≈ $256.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size6 mm13 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity—94 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life9 h7 h
Total with charging case—28 h
Battery capacity—50 mAh
Charging time2.2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare