vs
5.6Noise control & calls7.2
4.2Battery5.9
Why is GO PODS ANC better than HA-A23T?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
Why is HA-A23T better than GO PODS ANC?
- Battery life7.5 h vs 9 h+20%
- Battery life with ANC5 h vs 7 h+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 99 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Noise reduction (claimed) | 40 dB | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 26 h | 26 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Latency | 200 ms | — |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.2 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | Black, Lilac, Sage | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
