How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. GO PARTY vs TAS2000

JLab GO PARTY vs Philips TAS2000

What GO PARTY does better (3) and where TAS2000 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JLab GO PARTY
JLab · 2025GO PARTY
5.8Score
3 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
vs
Philips TAS2000
Philips · 2025TAS2000
0 advantages≈ $55
6.5Battery2.3

Why is GO PARTY better than TAS2000?

  1. Battery life16 h vs 5 h3.2×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx5+20%
  3. Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 2,500 mAh+60%

Why is TAS2000 better than GO PARTY?

TAS2000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JLab GO PARTYJLab GO PARTY≈ $405.8
Sound
Driver size50.8 mm—
Number of drivers6—
Output power10 W10 W
Speaker channels—2.0
Channel count—2
Lowest frequency80 Hz—
Highest frequency18,000 Hz—
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life16 h5 h
Battery capacity4,000 mAh2,500 mAh
Charging time3 h—
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.3—
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight660 g—
Protection ratingIPX6IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx6IPx5
Dust protection (IP)5—
ColoursBlack, Cyan, Mulberry, NavyWhite
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
Party / stereo pairingYes—
Light effectsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare