vs
4.2Noise control & calls3.0
5.2Battery3.2
7.1Build & features2.3
Why is Go Air Sport better than HA-A3T?
- Battery life8 h vs 7 h+14%
- Total with charging case32 h vs 22 h+45%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Earbud weight (each)6.2 g vs 10 g+61%
- Charging time2.2 h vs 3 h+36%
Why is HA-A3T better than Go Air Sport?
HA-A3T has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 6 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 32 h | 22 h |
| Battery capacity | 43 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2.2 h | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 58 g | — |
| Earbud weight (each) | 6.2 g | 10 g |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
