- Amidio
- Compare
- Go Air Sport+ True Wireless In-Ear-Kopfhörer, 35h, IP55 vs Melobuds N65 kabellose In-Ear-Kopfhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0
JLab Go Air Sport+ True Wireless In-Ear-Kopfhörer, 35h, IP55 vs QCY Melobuds N65 kabellose In-Ear-Kopfhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0
What Go Air Sport+ True Wireless In-Ear-Kopfhörer, 35h, IP55 does better (0) and where Melobuds N65 kabellose In-Ear-Kopfhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
6.8Score
Higher score 0 advantages≈ $35
vs
3.0Noise control & calls3.0
Why is Go Air Sport+ True Wireless In-Ear-Kopfhörer, 35h, IP55 better than Melobuds N65 kabellose In-Ear-Kopfhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0?
Go Air Sport+ True Wireless In-Ear-Kopfhörer, 35h, IP55 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Melobuds N65 kabellose In-Ear-Kopfhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 better than Go Air Sport+ True Wireless In-Ear-Kopfhörer, 35h, IP55?
- Battery life35 h vs 50 h+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | — |
| Driver size | 9 mm | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 35 h | 50 h |
| Total with charging case | 35 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | Grey, Black | White |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
