JLab Go Air Sport+ True Wireless In-Ear-Kopfhörer, 35h, IP55 vs Nothing CMF Buds 2a
What Go Air Sport+ True Wireless In-Ear-Kopfhörer, 35h, IP55 does better (2) and where CMF Buds 2a wins (2) — every spec side by side.
6.8Score
Higher score 2 advantages≈ $30
vs
3.1Noise control & calls5.6
9.4Battery5.2
Why is Go Air Sport+ True Wireless In-Ear-Kopfhörer, 35h, IP55 better than CMF Buds 2a?
- Battery life35 h vs 8 h4.4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is CMF Buds 2a better than Go Air Sport+ True Wireless In-Ear-Kopfhörer, 35h, IP55?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Go Air Sport+ True Wireless In-Ear-Kopfhörer, 35h, IP55: Yes
- Driver size9 mm vs 12.4 mm+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver size | 9 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 35 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 5 h |
| Total with charging case | 35 h | 36 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IP55 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Colours | Grey, Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
