How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Go Air Pop vs TAT2236

JLab Go Air Pop vs Philips TAT2236

What Go Air Pop does better (2) and where TAT2236 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JLab Go Air Pop
JLab · 2022Go Air Pop
4.7Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
vs
Philips TAT2236
Philips · 2021TAT2236
3.7Score
2 advantages≈ $25
3.1Noise control & calls3.1
5.3Battery2.7

Why is Go Air Pop better than TAT2236?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 6 h+33%
  2. Total with charging case32 h vs 18 h+78%

Why is TAT2236 better than Go Air Pop?

  1. Driver size6 mm vs 12 mm2×
  2. Charging time2.2 h vs 2 h+10%
Specifications

Side by side

JLab Go Air PopJLab Go Air Pop≈ $254.7
Philips TAT2236Philips TAT2236≈ $253.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size6 mm12 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω28 Ω
Sensitivity103 dB104 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h6 h
Total with charging case32 h18 h
Battery capacity43 mAh—
Charging time2.2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)3.7 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare