How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Go Air Pop vs TAT2139

JLab Go Air Pop vs Philips TAT2139

What Go Air Pop does better (2) and where TAT2139 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

JLab Go Air Pop
JLab · 2022Go Air Pop
4.7Score
2 advantages≈ $25
vs
Philips TAT2139
Philips · 2024TAT2139
7.0Score
5 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
3.1Noise control & calls9.3
5.3Battery4.4

Why is Go Air Pop better than TAT2139?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 7 h+14%
  2. Total with charging case32 h vs 28 h+14%

Why is TAT2139 better than Go Air Pop?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Go Air Pop: Yes
  2. Driver size6 mm vs 13 mm2.2×
  3. Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.3+4%
  4. Battery capacity43 mAh vs 50 mAh+16%
  5. Charging time2.2 h vs 2 h+10%
Specifications

Side by side

JLab Go Air PopJLab Go Air Pop≈ $254.7
Philips TAT2139Philips TAT2139≈ $257.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size6 mm13 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity103 dB94 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h7 h
Total with charging case32 h28 h
Battery capacity43 mAh50 mAh
Charging time2.2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.3
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)3.7 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare