How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Wave Flex vs KH-CRZ40T

JBL Wave Flex vs Kenwood KH-CRZ40T

What Wave Flex does better (2) and where KH-CRZ40T wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Wave Flex
JBL · 2022Wave Flex
8.3Score
2 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
vs
Kenwood KH-CRZ40T
Kenwood · 2022KH-CRZ40T
7.8Score
1 advantage≈ $45
6.2Battery4.7

Why is Wave Flex better than KH-CRZ40T?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 7.5 h+7%
  2. Driver size12 mm vs 6 mm2×

Why is KH-CRZ40T better than Wave Flex?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Wave FlexJBL Wave Flex≈ $458.3
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver size12 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity105 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h7.5 h
Battery life with ANC8 h—
Total with charging case32 h—
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.1
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—4.1 g
Protection ratingIP54IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare