How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Wave Flex 2 vs TAA6709BK/00

JBL Wave Flex 2 vs Philips TAA6709BK/00

What Wave Flex 2 does better (5) and where TAA6709BK/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Wave Flex 2
JBL · 2025Wave Flex 2
9.0Score
5 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Philips TAA6709BK/00
Philips · 2025TAA6709BK/00
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $55
9.3Noise control & calls4.2
7.6Battery4.4

Why is Wave Flex 2 better than TAA6709BK/00?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAA6709BK/00: No
  2. Battery life10 h vs 7 h+43%
  3. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 150 Hz7.5×
  4. Total with charging case40 h vs 28 h+43%
  5. Driver size12 mm vs 10 mm+20%

Why is TAA6709BK/00 better than Wave Flex 2?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Wave Flex 2JBL Wave Flex 2≈ $559.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size12 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz150 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB91 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h7 h
Total with charging case40 h28 h
Battery capacity—58 mAh
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Protection ratingIP54IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)55
Colours—Black, Red
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare