How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. WAVE Buds 3 vs TAT3000

JBL WAVE Buds 3 vs Philips TAT3000

What WAVE Buds 3 does better (1) and where TAT3000 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL WAVE Buds 3
JBL · 2026WAVE Buds 3
7.7Score
1 advantage≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Philips TAT3000
Philips · 2026TAT3000
0 advantages≈ $40
7.2Noise control & calls9.3

Why is WAVE Buds 3 better than TAT3000?

  1. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%

Why is TAT3000 better than WAVE Buds 3?

TAT3000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JBL WAVE Buds 3JBL WAVE Buds 3≈ $557.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size8 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity100 dB106 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h—
Battery life with ANC8 h—
Charging time2 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version66
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.9 g—
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare