vs
6.0Noise control & calls7.2
7.2Battery8.4
Why is Vibe Flex 2 better than HA-EC75T?
Vibe Flex 2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is HA-EC75T better than Vibe Flex 2?
- Battery life10 h vs 11 h+10%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
- Battery life with ANC6 h vs 9 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 11 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | 9 h |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | 40 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IP54 | IP57 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
