How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TUNE FLEX vs EAH-AZ40

JBL TUNE FLEX vs Technics EAH-AZ40

What TUNE FLEX does better (3) and where EAH-AZ40 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL TUNE FLEX
JBL · 2022TUNE FLEX
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ40
Technics · 2021EAH-AZ40
4.9Score
0 advantages≈ $70
5.1Battery4.7
5.2Build & features4.8

Why is TUNE FLEX better than EAH-AZ40?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 7.5 h+7%
  2. Driver size12 mm vs 6 mm2×
  3. Earbud weight (each)4.8 g vs 5 g+4%

Why is EAH-AZ40 better than TUNE FLEX?

EAH-AZ40 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JBL TUNE FLEXJBL TUNE FLEX≈ $756.2
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity110 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h7.5 h
Battery life with ANC6 h—
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.8 g5 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare