vs
7.2Noise control & calls3.0
4.6Battery4.4
Why is Tune Flex TWS better than HA-EC25T?
- Active noise cancellingYes · HA-EC25T: No
- Battery life8 h vs 7 h+14%
Why is HA-EC25T better than Tune Flex TWS?
- Total with charging case24 h vs 30 h+25%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 24 h | 30 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 6.9 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
