vs
7.2Noise control & calls3.0
4.6Battery3.2
Why is Tune Flex TWS better than HA-A3T?
- Active noise cancellingYes · HA-A3T: No
- Battery life8 h vs 7 h+14%
- Total with charging case24 h vs 22 h+9%
Why is HA-A3T better than Tune Flex TWS?
HA-A3T has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 24 h | 22 h |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.1 |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 10 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
